User talk:CJWorldGame32125

Calmly about the situation

I would like to explain this whole misunderstanding and why I do not have much trust in old users (yes, I know, I exaggerated a bit by calling them parasites), but just a question: why do you have such sentiment towards them, despite the fact that they were mainly responsible for closing Qualitipedia (not I'm talking about the RFC) and why did you treat my edits as if they were supposedly egoistic, as you call it, even though I didn't say that I was better than others and I don't even consider myself the best user. If you feel offended by this, I'm simply sorry, but I don't consider myself someone who wants to hurt you, I just want to have the best possible relationship with you. I hope for a peaceful response. -Szczypak64

The main reason why I defend them always is because they're my friends. I always supported them because they had their reasons, some of them are even my mentors (most notably TigerBlazer and Zangler), both of which gave me tips and help on how to make good pages in the original QP, so of course I supported them. Plus, most of their reasons for closing the original Qualitipedia make tons of sense. Couple with the fact that it has been incredibly stressful for many admins to handle a network where even the founder retired makes it much worse. The main reason why I follow their suggestions is because they had a much bigger history in QP, and they are more professional than newer users, so of course they have more knowledge. Also, the main reason why I had some disdain towards some of your edits is because some of them came across as you hiding your traces of your mistakes, like you editing a pointer of your mistake by claiming it was Blubabluba9990. Plus, you shouldn't have added the points of your private wiki being better than the original Crappy Games Wiki, it comes off as douchey. Some of the points related to New QP added in other pages are not added by me, and instead added by other users, because I don't think adding points praising me or my wikis is a good idea. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

I understand, although not on my part (I wouldn't want you to be offended) it looks a bit funny because in a sense it was them who caused this with their ill-considered decisions (especially Allistayrian), even before this closure I had no sympathy for them, especially since they treated me like garbage, for example Allistayrian who literally banned me along with Katsumi from the Crappy Games Wiki just because "my edits weren't good enough" although she later unbanned me but luckily now regrets it or Zangler who I also had a hard time with and recognized every activity I did on those wikis and no matter how they were justified as "inappropriate" and that could be construed as a personal attack, as soon as it was an RFC Blazikeye laughed at me just because I wanted the game wikis to stay and a user named GyrineZ literally called me "Dumb Fuck" only because I opposed the RFC, it formed in me this aversion to that society and in a sense it also caused me to ban TigerBlazer because I was afraid of her and had no idea what her intentions were, especially since many users like she did absolutely nothing and only complained about the existence of this wiki, these are the main reasons why I despise this community, so to put it simply, I was simply treated unfairly by them when I wanted the best possible relationship with them... -Szczypak64

Yes, I criticized their activities and I was the one who predicted the early closure of the wiki, warning that it would not last long, but Zangler said, of course, that there was nothing, and DarkMatterMan, despite admitting to me that these wikis would not survive, even threatened to block me even though i did actually nothing wrong. I didn't, so as you can see, the story is quite sad, so you might wonder if it's worth blaming me? -Szczypak64

I understand, although Blazikeye laughing at you was a bit understandable, you can't ask that, since this was an RfC. Also, you shouldn't have been afraid of Tiger. You could have waited a bit to see what they would have done. Also, they're not female, they use the "they/them" pronouns. Remember that. GyrineZ's situation was something nobody even heard of (aside from Raidarr, who admitted he was a "bit of a turd" in his own words on Discord). I'm currently asking DarkMatter why he did that, asking his side of the story. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 18:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

DarkMatterMan claimed he doesn't remember much from that event. Maybe he did that when he was in rage to keep QP afloat, since during that time....you know. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Well, I didn't feel very good, the way I was treated all the time, it also caused me to behave like that on Tiresome Wikis Wiki, I just felt pointer when this indicator appeared criticizing the block I imposed because it only condemned my trauma related to those users and I didn't want to be associated with those users, or rather I would rather forget about them as if I had never heard of them, I knew many users although I'm not saying all of them, there were some nice users like Ivanov Quirkafleeg, Nonstopmaximum and ExploringEditor and few more but the rest.... no I even want to comment, it's good that most of that society left and the pointer I added because I simply felt like taking revenge on them for having to endure this pain. To put it simply, I just wanted to free myself from this nightmare and build a relatively solid reputation, although in a sense I succeeded because everyone on New Qualitipedia likes me, for example Robin who said that he couldn't find another person who was also interested in retro games or also ChessGuy who thought I was leaving Qualitipedia and was devastated by this fact. -Szczypak64

Dude, I suggest you to take a break from the Internet. Tali told me to suggest you that, since it might be the best option for you. Not deflecting anything you say, it's just a better option for how you feel right now. CJWorldGame32125 (talk) 05:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Actually, you're partly right, I won't give up the Internet completely because I'm also active in other communities, but maybe I'll take a break from reception wiki for maybe... a month? However, I will not leave my own wiki and I will continue to develop it and no one will stop me, and as I said, if you don't want to, don't do it, but leave others alone. Maybe someday I'll tell you more about myself... -Szczypak64

I've decided to back but...

I would like to discuss with you a bit about the future of Qualitipedia as a whole and propose changes that might give it a better reputation, telling you what I would do in your place and I would also like to consider blacklisting me. but let me start with this unfortunate blacklist: "Extremely harsh to retired Qualitipedia users and supporters of the RfC to shut down QP (once calling them parasites), being egotistical, as proven in Tiresome Wikis Wiki, where he added the point of his wiki being better than the original, as well being desperate to salvage his dwindling reputation, by removing any mention of his mistakes, and instead edits pages like the others are the ones that did his mistakes. Because of that, he's been permanently blacklisted." And here a few things come to mind, let's start with what we have already discussed in detail:

I'll start with those retirees and RFC supporters, I've covered this issue quite a bit in the discussion above, and the vast majority of them haven't even made a single edit, and even if they do, it's usually a ridiculous few edits, like in the case of JigglyPuffGuy04 who you like to comment on and basically all of them are inactive, so even if they were blocked (I don't intend to do it for now, unless they start trashing discussions and comments by saying that the wiki shouldn't exist on its own and don't contribute anything or do something even worse), it wouldn't affect anyone. impressions and it is nothing more than digging graves. Generally speaking, it will be better to forget about them if they were never part of this network, which they probably would like to do.
Now this unfortunate issue with this Tiresome Wikis Wiki:
1. Claiming that your own wiki is better than the original - Don't be offended but it sounds quite childish to me, a very fiddling reason for blacklisting me, I'm surprised that you even care, and besides, it's my wiki that only a select few have access to, so it's best to just leave it alone and this whole topic.
2. Placing myself in the pointers that I add - basically I can say the same as with this wiki, so I will not elaborate on it.
3. Even though it's hard enough to disprove something, it doesn't really matter what I do on Qualitipedia or what my intentions are towards the users, and I'm done with that wiki considering how terrible the community is.
"Declining reputation" - do you have any evidence for this? From what it seems to me, everyone on New Qualitipedia likes me and I haven't had a war with anyone at all, so the chances that I would ban someone out of nowhere are zero.

In general, to sum up, if I were you, I would rather place users who have serious dramas with other wiki users and I would take their block history and how they behave on New Qualitipedia rather than disputes that took place somewhere else and the rest should be taken into account attention is whether someone can actually pose a real threat on the wiki.

Okay, now I can move on to what I would do in your place:

I would always listen to what loyal users have to say and try to solve problems in a peaceful way so that everyone is happy with the solution, this can improve their morale and their relationship with you and this can build a reasonable reputation for Qualitipedia which the old community has pushed to the extreme seriously damaging it.
I am pro-freedom, which means that I believe that "My pages = My business, My blogs = My business, My wiki = My business, etc." and I wouldn't remove anyone's property unless they were offended, I would just ignore it all.
I wouldn't delete pages just because they're copied (I even advised you to do so once), if they bother you that much you can always move them to the sandbox, and I wouldn't delete pages just because they have poor metrics and/or are unfinished as to controversies related to old wikis, I would simply avoid sites that have mixed reception as they may or may not cause controversy, which is why QP had such a reputation.
And finally, I would never, ever treat popular opinions as facts, this is something I despise for all eternity, because it was the real nail in the coffin of the old wikis, a mistake that, like with deleting pages due to tips, was also made by Allistayrian who wanted, that the parties rely solely on receipt. This never leads to anything good.

I'm counting on a conversation as peaceful as the previous one, and maybe together we'll even lead QP to a better situation, especially since I care about QP, unlike most of your friends from the old QP who ruined it, it's best to keep your sympathy for them to yourself. - Szczypak64